recombinant human fgf1 (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Recombinant Human Fgf1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 3 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/recombinant+human+fgf1/bio_rxiv__64898__2026__01__13__699240-186-0-6?v=R%26D+Systems
Average 94 stars, based on 3 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The Ets transcription factor ETV4 regulates FGF1-dependent proliferation and glycolysis in ER-positive breast cancer"
Article Title: The Ets transcription factor ETV4 regulates FGF1-dependent proliferation and glycolysis in ER-positive breast cancer
Journal: bioRxiv
doi: 10.64898/2026.01.13.699240
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) ETV4 expression in breast tumors and paired normal breast tissue from people with breast cancer. Data obtained from tnmplot.com. Mann-Whitney test determined significance. (B) High ETV4 expression (RNA seq) associates with lower overall survival for people with breast cancer. HR=1.44 (1.14-1.82). (C) Tumors with high ETV4 expression (mRNA z-score >1.5) are more likely to be ER-negative than ER-positive. Chi-squared test q-value <0.0001. (D) High ETV4 expression (RNA seq) associates with lower overall survival for patients with ER-positive breast cancer. HR=1.39 (1.05-1.85). (E) High ETV4 expression (array) associates with lower recurrence-free survival for patients with lymph node-positive ER-positive breast cancer. HR=1.3 (1.031-1.628). (F) ETV4 expression in ER-positive breast tumors stratified by pathologic complete response after aromatase inhibitors using data from ROCplotter.com. (G) ETV4 expression in ER-positive tumors stratified by pathologic complete response to any chemotherapy using data from ROCplotter.com. Mann-Whitney test determined significance for f and g . (H) ETV4 expression (RNA seq) in UCD12 PDX tumors from lean or obese female mice. (I) ETV4 expression (array) in tumors from patients with ER-positive breast cancer (data from GSE24185). (J) Pearson correlation between ETV4 and FGF1 expression in tumors from patients classified as obese, overweight, or lean based on BMI (data from GSE24185). (K) Expression of ETV4 in ER-positive breast cancer cells with or without FGF1 treatment. MCF7 Parental (M7P) or TAMR (M7T); UCD12 (U12). (L) Representative western blot showing ETV4 expression in ER-positive breast cancer cells with or without FGF1 treatment.
Techniques Used: Expressing, MANN-WHITNEY, RNA Sequencing, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Q-PCR ( left ) and immunoblot ( right ) analysis of ETV4 in MCF7-P cells. (B) Q-PCR ( left ) and immunoblot ( right ) analysis of ETV4 in MCF7-TAMR cells. (C) Representative images of the final timepoint (left) and growth rates (right) of MCF7-P control or ETV4-knockdown cells treated with vehicle or FGF1. (D) Area confluence relative to control vehicle time 0 of cells at the final timepoint following treatment of MCF7-P cells. Two-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 knockdown or FGF1 treatment or interaction was performed. P-values indicate post-hoc multiple testing for specific differences between pre-defined comparisons. (E) Representative images of the final timepoint (left) and growth rates (right) of MCF7-TAMR control or ETV4-knockdown cells treated with vehicle or FGF1. (F) Area confluence relative to control vehicle time 0 of cells at the final timepoint following treatment of MCF7-TAMR cells. Two-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 knockdown or FGF1 treatment or interaction was performed. P-values indicate post-hoc multiple testing for specific differences between pre-defined comparisons. (G) Dose-response curve and interpolated IC 50 values of tamoxifen treatment in MCF7-P control and ETV4 knockdown cells following treatment with or without FGF1. (H) Dose-response curve and interpolated IC 50 values of tamoxifen treatment in MCF7-TAMR control and ETV4 knockdown cells following treatment with or without FGF1.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Knockdown
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Expression of ETV4 gene ( left ) and protein ( right ) following knockdown in MCF7-P cells. (B) Expression of ETV4 gene ( left ) and protein ( right ) following knockdown in MCF7-TAMR cells. (C) Representative images of the final timepoint (left) and growth rates (right) of MCF7-P control or ETV4-overexpressing cells treated with vehicle or FGF1. (D) Area confluence relative to control vehicle time 0 of cells at the final timepoint following treatment of MCF7-P cells. Two-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 overexpression or FGF1 treatment or interaction was performed. P-values indicate post-hoc multiple testing for specific differences between pre-defined comparisons. (E) Representative images of the final timepoint (left) and growth rates (right) of MCF7-TAMR control or ETV4-overexpressing cells treated with vehicle or FGF1. (F) Area confluence relative to control vehicle time 0 of cells at the final timepoint following treatment of MCF7-TAMR cells. Two-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 overexpression or FGF1 treatment or interaction was performed. P-values indicate post-hoc multiple testing for specific differences between pre-defined comparisons. (G) Dose-response curve and interpolated IC 50 values of tamoxifen treatment in MCF7-P control and ETV4 overexpressing cells following treatment with or without FGF1. (H) Dose-response curve and interpolated IC 50 values of tamoxifen treatment in MCF7-TAMR control and ETV4 overexpressing cells following treatment with or without FGF1. (I) Dose-response curve and interpolated IC 50 values of BGJ398 treatment in MCF7-P and MCF7-TAMR control and ETV4 overexpressing cells.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Knockdown, Control, Over Expression
Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Bubble plot of gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showing enriched pathways in MCF7-TAMR control, ETV4 knockdown, and ETV4-overexpressing cells with or without FGF1 stimulation. (B) Hallmarks of Cancer enrichment plot illustrating the pathways represented by genes that are downregulated by ≥2-fold (adjusted p-value) in ETV4 knockdown compared with control vehicle-treated MCF7-TAMR cells. Bar height reflects −log10 adjusted p-value, with dashed circles indicating significance thresholds. (C) Volcano plot comparing ETV4 knockdown versus control vehicle-treated MCF7-TAMR cells, highlighting downregulated genes involved in reprogramming energy metabolism. Blue points denote significantly downregulated genes. Blue points denote significantly downregulated genes that correspond to the significant cancer hallmarks. (D) Hallmarks of Cancer enrichment plot illustrating the pathways represented by genes that are upregulated by ≥1.58-fold (adjusted p-value) in MCF7-TAMR ETV4 overexpressing cells treated with FGF1 vs vehicle controls. Bar height reflects −log10 adjusted p-value, with dashed circles indicating significance thresholds, including sustaining proliferative signaling. (E) Volcano plot comparing genes significantly altered in MCF7-TAMR ETV4 overexpressing cells treated with or without FGF1. Red points denote significantly upregulated genes that correspond to the significant cancer hallmarks.
Techniques Used: Control, Knockdown
Figure Legend Snippet: (A-B) Heatmaps showing mRNA expression levels of glycolytic pathway genes (HK2, PFKP, PGK1, ENO1, and LDHA) under vehicle and FGF1-treated conditions in MCF7-P ( a ) and MCF7-TAMR ( b ) control and ETV4 knockdown cells, respectively. Data are expressed as fold change versus the average of vehicle treated cells for each gene, showing 3 replicates per group. (C) Seahorse metabolic flux analysis showing the kinetic graph of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in MCF7-P cells. (D-G) Metabolic parameters including basal respiration ( d ), maximal respiration ( e ), ATP-production coupled respiration ( f ), and ECAR ( g ) in control and ETV4 knockdown MCF7-P cells, upon vehicle and FGF1 stimulation. Data analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 or FGF1 treatment or interactions. P-values denote post-hoc analysis of specific comparisons. (H) Seahorse metabolic flux analysis showing the kinetic graph of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in MCF7-TAMR cells. (I-L) Metabolic parameters including basal respiration ( i ), maximal respiration ( j ), ATP-production coupled respiration ( k ), and ECAR ( l ) in control and ETV4 knockdown MCF7-TAMR cells, upon vehicle and FGF1 stimulation. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 or FGF1 treatment or interactions. P-values denote post-hoc analysis of specific comparisons. All Seahorse data were normalized to total protein in each well. N=16-24 replicates per measure.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Knockdown
Figure Legend Snippet: (A-B) Heatmaps showing mRNA expression levels of glycolytic pathway genes (HK2, PFKP, PGK1, ENO1, and LDHA) under vehicle and FGF1-treated conditions in MCF7-P ( a ) and MCF7-TAMR ( b ) control and ETV4 overexpressing cells, respectively. Data are expressed as fold change versus the average of vehicle treated cells for each gene, showing 3 replicates per group. (C) Seahorse metabolic flux analysis showing the kinetic graph of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in MCF7-P cells. (D-G) Metabolic parameters including basal respiration ( d ), maximal respiration ( e ), ATP-production coupled respiration ( f ), and ECAR ( g ) in control and ETV4 overexpressing MCF7-P cells upon vehicle and FGF1 stimulation. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 or FGF1 treatment or interactions. P-values denote post-hoc analysis of specific comparisons. (H) Seahorse metabolic flux analysis showing the kinetic graph of oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in MCF7-TAMR cells. (I-L) Metabolic parameters including basal respiration ( i ), maximal respiration ( j ), ATP-production coupled respiration ( k ), and ECAR ( l ) in control and ETV4 knockdown MCF7-TAMR cells, upon vehicle and FGF1 stimulation. Data were analyzed using a 2-way ANOVA testing for main effects of ETV4 or FGF1 treatment or interactions. P-values denote post-hoc analysis of specific comparisons. All Seahorse data were normalized to total protein in each well. N=16-24 replicates per measure.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Control, Knockdown

